1989
DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(89)90167-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parallelizing preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical results for positive definite problems, both symmetric and nonsymmetric, have previously been given in [3], [4], [12].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical results for positive definite problems, both symmetric and nonsymmetric, have previously been given in [3], [4], [12].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the computational work per step is O(h -1 even for highly nonuniform and refined meshes. For numerical experiments on parallel computers, see [1], [16]. -1 for problems with discontinuous coefficients.…”
Section: Hierarchical Basis Preconditioner (Hb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, previous works [12], [16] have shown that for many of the classical preconditioners, there is a fundamental trade-off in the ease of parallelization and the rate of convergence. A principal obstacle to parallelization is the sequential manner in which many preconditioners traverse the computational gridthe data dependence implicitly prescribed by the method fundamentally limits the amount of parallelism available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the closed set J consists of accumulation points (at which the inequality (11) holds because the left side is zero) and a countable number of isolated points, we may integrate over (0, t) to obtain…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%