Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics

Abstract

To determine the potential differences in control underlying compensatory and voluntary reach-to-grasp movements the current study compared the kinematic and electromyographic profiles associated with upper limb movement. Postural perturbations were delivered to evoke compensatory reach-to-grasp in ten healthy young adult volunteers while seated on a chair that tilted as an inverted pendulum in the frontal plane. Participants reached to grasp a laterally positioned stable handhold and pulled (or pushed) to return the chair to vertical. The distinguishing characteristic between the two behaviors was the onset latency and speed of movement. Consistent with compensatory balance reactions, the perturbation-evoked reach response was initiated very rapidly (137 vs. 239 ms for voluntary). As well the movement time was shorter, and peak velocity was greater for PERT movements. In spite of the profound differences in timing, the sequence of muscle activity onsets and the order of specific kinematic events were not different between maximum velocity voluntary (VOL) and perturbation-evoked (PERT) reach-to-grasp movements. Peak velocity and grasp aperture occurred prior to hand contact with the target for PERT and VOL movements, and wrist trajectory was influenced by the direction of perturbation relative to the target. To achieve such target specific control for responses initiated within 100 ms of the perturbation, and when characteristics of body movement were unpredictable, the perturbation-evoked movements would need to incorporate sensory cues associated with body movement relative to the target into the earliest aspects of the movement. This suggests reliance on an internal spatial map constructed prior to the onset of perturbation. Parallels in electromyographic and kinematic profiles between compensatory and voluntary reach-to-grasp movements, in spite of temporal differences, lead to the view they are controlled by common neural mechanisms.

Influence of wearing an unstable shoe construction on compensatory control of posture

“…Evoked compensatory postural muscle responses are produced when instability occurs (Britton et al, 1993) and are of shorter latency than voluntary activation of the same muscles (Gage et al, 2007;Maki & McIlroy, 1997). Despite a very short latency, the balance-recovery reactions are remarkably complex.…”

Brain Correlates of Lane Changing Reaction Time in Simulated Driving

“…The shorter distance leads to higher demand of lane change, not only from the visual perception of closer object (larger) but also the higher temporal urgency of the task, which needs to be reacted more rapidly [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Current debates exist about the mechanism of the reduction of response latency in urgent situations, either caused by different CNS pathways or a common pathway but more rapid response latency [13], [14]. The brain patterns obtained in the present study are similar among the reactive trials no matter the diversity of reaction times, in terms of ERP peaks and oscillatory power modulations, given the truth that all responding trials require action within certain period, i.e., the vehicle will be damaged if no response is taken place.…”

The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions

“…Reflective markers were placed on the right shoulder (acromion process), wrist (styloid process), and hand (distal end of the 3rd metacarpal). The recorded coordinates for these markers were low-pass filtered at a cut-off frequency of 6 Hz using a dual-pass fourth-order Butterworth filter (Gage et al 2007). Data for the right wrist were used to determine maximum resultant velocity (relative to the right shoulder) and 'time after peak velocity' (i.e.…”