Parameatal Urethral Cyst: A Case Report

Abstract

On yedi yaşında erkek hasta üretral meatusta 15 mm şişlik ile başvurdu. Değerlendirmede hasta işeme ile ilgili şikayet bildirmedi. Hasta kozmetik amaçlı tedavi arayışındaydı. Genç erkeklerde oldukça nadir görülen parameatal üretral kist benign bir durum olup literatürde olgu sayısı oldukça azdır. Kiste literatür önerisine uygun şekilde tam eksizyon uygulandı. Postoperatif takibinde hastanın hiçbir problemi olmadı. Anahtar Kelimeler: Olgu, kist, üretral meatus A 17-year-old boy presented with 15 mm swelling on the left side of his urethral meatus. He did not report any voiding symptoms. He was seeking medical treatment due to cosmetic concerns. Parameatal urethral cysts are benign conditions that are rarely reported in the literature. We performed complete excision of the cyst as previously suggested by some authors. On postoperative follow-up, there were no findings of voiding difficulty and cosmetic problem.

Parameatal urethral cyst: A case series of three rare cases and literature review

“…In comparison, 20 % of others produced the symptoms of dysuria, urinary flow distortion, or pain in a ruptured cyst. The case of urinary retention in a 17-year-old patient with a parameatal cyst has also been reported by Vechiol et al [ 6 , 13 ]. Concerning this case series, the first patient came without any symptoms.…”

“…Parameatal cyst is more commonly found in children than adults, with a prevalence of 1–6 % in adult women [ 4 ]. Adult prevalence is rare, and <100 cases have been reported worldwide [ [4] , [5] , [6] ]. Until now, the cause of parameatal cyst is still unclear.…”

Parameatal Urethral Cyst in a 20-Year-Old Male Patient: A Case Report

“…The largest series was published by Willis et al in 2011, which reported 18 pre-pubertal boys. In addition to this series, Shiraki reported 9 cases in 1975 (Hodson et al, 2012;Saki et al, 2017;Tavukcu et al, 2017). Shiraki (1975) interpreted that this cyst may have formed from occlusion of the paraurethral duct or, in other cases, derived from incomplete preputial separation of the gland along the coronal sulcus (Yamada et al, 2013;Patil et al, 2015).…”

“…This condition is a rare case report, only less than 50 cases have been reported. The first case was reported by Thompson andLantin in 1956 (Shaw et al, 2018;Tavukcu et al, 2017;Oktaviani & Hoetama, 2020;Lal & Ankur, 2013).…”

“…The action that can be performed is a surgical cyst excision procedure with the patient under anesthesia. Surgical procedures must be carried out carefully so as not to cause meatal stenosis, to prevent recurrence and obtain good cosmetic results (Partin et al, 2021;Shaw et al, 2018;Mahato et al, 2014;Tavukcu et al, 2017;Oktaviani & Hoetama, 2020;Lal & Ankur, 2013).…”