Paramedian Approach for Subarachnoid Blockade – A Marvellous Technique having Less Attention

Abstract

At present central neuroaxial blockade, e.g. subarachnoid blockade (SAB) or epidural blockade (EB), especially the former one, is widely used by the clinical anaesthesiologists due to its procedural simplicity, low cost & better physiological benefits and thus reduced complications than that of general anaesthesia (GA). Subarachnoid or epidural spaces can be traversed from the posterior aspect of the body either through a midline approach (MA) or a paramedian approach (PMA). There is another approach described as ‘lumbosacral puncture' or Taylor's approach, which actually is a variant of conventional paramedian approach. Theoretically, subarachnoid & epidural spaces can also be approached through the paravertebral foramen or even via an anterior intraoperative approach through the intervertebral discs1. The most common & popular technique is the MA. But the PMA (both conventional & Taylor's) is also a very easy & effective technique that can be practiced routinely as well as for some clearly indicated cases. The requirement for this procedure is the same as for the MA except having some ideas about the offmidline anatomy. Keywords: Blockade, subarachnoid; approach, paramedian. Journal of BSA, Vol. 19, No. 1 & 2, 2006 p.51-53

A comparative evaluation between median and paramedian approaches for sub-arachnoid block in elderly patients

“…It is simpler, cheaper and offers better physiological benefits with lesser complications than general anaesthesia. 1 It can be given by either median or paramedian approach. For the midline approach, the desired interspace is palpated and local anaesthetic is injected into the skin and subcutaneous tissue.…”

Ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture with a needle-guidance system: A prospective and controlled study to evaluate the learnability and feasibility of a newly developed approach

“…Thirdly, since the conventional landmark-guided approach was not possible in our model due to the lack of a phantom os ilium, we based our procedure on that described by Srinivasan et al[ 9 ] These authors applied a pre-procedural scan using the paramedian sagittal oblique (PSO) view of the spinal canal, which, according to most studies, provides the optimal window for ultrasound imaging[ 23 ]. Srinivasan et al complemented their approach with a paramedian needle insertion point, for which many authors have described theoretical advantages over the conventional midline approach[ 31 , 32 ]. Using this approach in a prospective randomized controlled study, Srinivasan and colleagues were able to demonstrate a significant decrease in the number of both needle passes and attempts in comparison to the conventional landmark-guided midline approach.…”

Comparative study of midline versus paramedian approach of spinal block in elderly.

“…1 General anesthesia is associated with a number of perioperative complications, while spinal block offers simple, safe and cost effective anesthetic technique. 2,3 Spinal block is especially considered a safe and preferred method for elderly patients undergoing infra umblical surgical procedures. With the use of spinal anaesthesia there are less chances of intra-operative hypertension and tachycardia, less analgesic requirement in the post anaesthesia recovery room, less incidence of nausea and vomiting in 24 h postoperatively, and a shorter hospital stay compared with general anaesthesia.…”