2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2013.6638353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter estimation and classification of censored Gaussian data with application to WiFi indoor positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard EM algorithm for GMM [5] After [3] Proposed EM algorithm for C-GMM As is evident, when c = µ 1 -2σ 1 = -96, data nearly do not suffer from censoring (almost complete); the proposal and the standard EM algorithm for GMM produced the same results. However, when c changes from -93 to -84, the proposed EM algorithm introduces improved results.…”
Section: (Dbm)mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Standard EM algorithm for GMM [5] After [3] Proposed EM algorithm for C-GMM As is evident, when c = µ 1 -2σ 1 = -96, data nearly do not suffer from censoring (almost complete); the proposal and the standard EM algorithm for GMM produced the same results. However, when c changes from -93 to -84, the proposed EM algorithm introduces improved results.…”
Section: (Dbm)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Positioning results were improved relative to the single Gaussian model. However, the censoring problem has not been considered in these studies, although they clearly occurred, as discussed in [3,4].…”
Section: Faculty Of Electronics Hanoi University Of Industry 2 Natiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides evaluating SEMcm algorithm on some trivial data sets (one component with left-censoring [11]; one doublycensored component), we successfully evaluated SEMcmG on a simulated mixture of two left-censored components, which was meant to emulate interference affected RSSI samples. The first component represents the signal over a distance range identical to the range considered in the empirical data evaluation: l d = 23−−32, where l d is the log-distance, defined as 10 log 10 (distance in m).…”
Section: A Model Evaluation On Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%