1965
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1965.10490268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Estimation for a Generalized Gamma Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we also employ a third model only for heteroscedastic and heavy tailed data where the true underlying model of G is used to illustrate the best case scenario; we refer to this model as GGM-het2. Several methods exist for the estimation of the parameters of this distribution (Hager and Bain, 1970;Lawless, 1980;Wingo, 1987;Cohen and Whitten, 1986;Stacy and Mihram, 1965;Balakrashnan and Chan, 1994). We employ full-information maximum likelihood method to estimate the parameters of the model.…”
Section: Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, we also employ a third model only for heteroscedastic and heavy tailed data where the true underlying model of G is used to illustrate the best case scenario; we refer to this model as GGM-het2. Several methods exist for the estimation of the parameters of this distribution (Hager and Bain, 1970;Lawless, 1980;Wingo, 1987;Cohen and Whitten, 1986;Stacy and Mihram, 1965;Balakrashnan and Chan, 1994). We employ full-information maximum likelihood method to estimate the parameters of the model.…”
Section: Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The most general form of gamma distribution is the modified (also known as generalized) gamma distribution (CG) (Grant et al, 2011). It was introduced by Stacy and Mihran (1965). The detailed Gamma distribution can be referred from Vasile (2010).…”
Section: Gamma Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape adjustment parameter, s, accounts for the tail behavior away from the origin (the upper tail), the Nakagami parameter, m, accounts for the tail behavior close to the origin (the lower tail) and the noise power, Ω, determines the spread of the density function [18]. The distribution parameters (m and s) can be estimated from the positive subband data using the maximum likelihood estimation technique as [31] …”
Section: Probability Density Function For the Speckle Wavelet Coefficmentioning
confidence: 99%