2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/836518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Estimation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models with Stochastic Differential Equations: Implementation of an Estimation Algorithm

Abstract: Population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models play a pivotal role in quantitative pharmacology study, which are classically analyzed by nonlinear mixed-effects models based on ordinary differential equations. This paper describes the implementation of SDEs in population pharmacokinetic models, where parameters are estimated by a novel approximation of likelihood function. This approximation is constructed by combining the MCMC method used in nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with the extended Kalman filter used in SD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multidimensional situation makes appropriate choices of priors even more difficult. In the context of SDE-based pharmacokinetic models Yan et al (2014), following de la Cruz-Mesía and Marshall (2006), proposed independent normal priors for the components of µ, given by µ i ∼ N A i , B 2 i , and an inverse Wishart prior for Σ with scale matrix Σ 0 and degrees of freedom d + 1. However, because of the difficulties of eliciting information, they assume non-informative priors for the hyperparameters.…”
Section: S-2 Illustration Of Advantages Of Bayesian Analysis Over Cla...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The multidimensional situation makes appropriate choices of priors even more difficult. In the context of SDE-based pharmacokinetic models Yan et al (2014), following de la Cruz-Mesía and Marshall (2006), proposed independent normal priors for the components of µ, given by µ i ∼ N A i , B 2 i , and an inverse Wishart prior for Σ with scale matrix Σ 0 and degrees of freedom d + 1. However, because of the difficulties of eliciting information, they assume non-informative priors for the hyperparameters.…”
Section: S-2 Illustration Of Advantages Of Bayesian Analysis Over Cla...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informative priors can be elicited if historical data, that is, data associated with previous studies, are available. Then, following Yan et al (2014), using the aforementioned non-informative priors, one can first obtain the posterior distributions of µ and Σ, given only the historical data. These posterior distributions based on historical data can then be used as informative prior distributions for Bayesian analysis of the current data.…”
Section: S-2 Illustration Of Advantages Of Bayesian Analysis Over Cla...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the sparsity and irregular sampling of PK/PD data has made it difficult to directly apply these parameter estimation methods. Nevertheless, some attempts to develop methods for parameter estimation in NLME models with stochastic dynamics have been successful, using for example (i) Bayesian inference (9,10), (ii) expectation maximization (EM) methods (11)(12)(13), and (iii) by expanding the traditional gradient-based estimation methods using Kalman filters (14,15). These methods have been used for several PK/PD applications (16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%