2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11012-018-0914-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter identification in elastoplastic material models by Small Punch Tests and inverse analysis with model reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• According to the previous point, in order to ensure a robust and reliable parameter identification procedure, specific requirements are expected in the measuring stages, namely 10.672 +3.73% −4.45% +0.28% f 13 10.888 +4.45% −5.72% +0.23% f 14 12.139 +1.38% −4.10% +0.06% f 15 12.160 +4.05% −1.55% +0.01% f 16 12.490 +2.43% −1.46% +0.09% significantly reducing noise effects and providing complete structural observations, possibly complemented by local detailing measurements and estimations.…”
Section: Optimised Structural Modelling On the Case Study Of A His-to...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• According to the previous point, in order to ensure a robust and reliable parameter identification procedure, specific requirements are expected in the measuring stages, namely 10.672 +3.73% −4.45% +0.28% f 13 10.888 +4.45% −5.72% +0.23% f 14 12.139 +1.38% −4.10% +0.06% f 15 12.160 +4.05% −1.55% +0.01% f 16 12.490 +2.43% −1.46% +0.09% significantly reducing noise effects and providing complete structural observations, possibly complemented by local detailing measurements and estimations.…”
Section: Optimised Structural Modelling On the Case Study Of A His-to...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state of the art, in the context of aforementioned Inverse Analysis approaches, presents several contributions, particularly within Industrial Engineering applications, e.g., for material characterisation and diagnosis of metallic structural components [9,10,11,12,13], for mechanical characterisation of advanced materials [14,15], and for biomechanical identification [16]. With shared methodologies, in recent years, a growing interest has been exerted for Inverse Analysis also in Civil Engineering context, as, e.g., in material characterisation of concrete structures [17,18], in bridge and infrastructure analysis [19,20,21], and in structural identification [22,23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w = (∆φ w /2π)•∆s w (12) where subscripts u, v and w refer to the different displacement components and ∆φ/2π is the fractional fringe order for the corresponding unwrapped phase distribution ∆φ.…”
Section: One-shot Projection Moiré Measurements and Impm Variantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation of error functional Ω depends on the type of identification problem; for example, in indentation/nanoindentation problems, reaction forces at the indenter/body interface also may be considered, while in dynamic problems, natural frequencies and modal shapes can be utilized as target quantities; strains and stresses also may be involved in the definition of Ω. Maier and his collaborators [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] carried out pioneering work on mechanical identification of materials and structures, considering a variety of cases such as, for example, elasto-plasticity (also accounting for material anisotropy, inhomogeneity and functional grading), indentation, residual stresses, multiaxial fatigue, damage and fracture, thin foil mechanics, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect method is an inverse analysis method [ 19 , 28 , 29 ] based on finite element (FE) simulation, where the appropriate TSL is determined by comparing the numerical solution with the experimental measurements. Maier [ 30 , 31 ], using an inverse analysis strategy, estimated residual stress and identified the elastic–plastic material parameters. However, this method requires continuous trial and error, is computationally inefficient, and is dependent on the initial parameter estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%