In this paper, several existing porous bleed models are implemented into the in-house RANS-solver elsA, and their performance is evaluated on two different flow cases. Reference simulations are performed to evaluate the accuracy of the applied bleed models and to show the lack of modeling different plate geometries. The models significantly differ in predicting the bleed mass flux along the plate. For the turbulent supersonic boundary layer bleeding, the reference simulations demonstrate a hole diameter influence on the flow, but none of the models considers this effect. The model of Slater fits well with the reference simulation by applying it to its extracted data. However, applying the bleed models as a boundary condition results in more significant deviations from the reference simulation, leading to an overestimation of the wall shear stress and fuller boundary layer profiles downstream of the bleed region. Additionally, in the second flow case, including the shock-boundary layer interaction, the effect of the porous bleed is overestimated. No model is found suitable for a shock-boundary layer interaction control, and essential parameters such as the bleed hole diameter are not considered.