2006
DOI: 10.1080/01431160600617194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter selection for region‐growing image segmentation algorithms using spatial autocorrelation

Abstract: Region-growing segmentation algorithms are useful for remote sensing image segmentation. These algorithms need the user to supply control parameters, which control the quality of the resulting segmentation. This letter proposes an objective function for selecting suitable parameters for region-growing algorithms to ensure best quality results. It considers that a segmentation has two desirable properties: each of the resulting segments should be internally homogeneous and should be distinguishable from its nei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
282
0
13

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
282
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the case of advanced per-pixel classification algorithms (such as the SOM neural network used here), an equally time consuming "trial-and-error" approach is also commonly required to optimise the network parameters. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that there are on-going attempts to devise more quantitative and automated segmentation parameter selection methods [63][64][65], which are anticipated to help increase the efficiency and optimisation of this process, and ultimately produce better results than currently attainable through "trial-and-error" [50].…”
Section: Lithological Contact Mapping Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of advanced per-pixel classification algorithms (such as the SOM neural network used here), an equally time consuming "trial-and-error" approach is also commonly required to optimise the network parameters. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that there are on-going attempts to devise more quantitative and automated segmentation parameter selection methods [63][64][65], which are anticipated to help increase the efficiency and optimisation of this process, and ultimately produce better results than currently attainable through "trial-and-error" [50].…”
Section: Lithological Contact Mapping Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiresolution segmentation is an option that generates segments of different size, and where the user has the option to choose optimal segment size (Baatz and Schape 2000). To choose such an optimal segment size objectively, Espindola et al (2006) proposed an objective function for measuring the quality of the resulting segments. Therefore, we created segments/objects of different scale parameters, with thresholds ranging from 10 to 50.…”
Section: Generation Of Hsu Through Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Moran's I represent how, on average, the mean value of each region differs from the mean values of its neighbours. The objective function thus combines the variance measure and autocorrelation measure using a normalisation procedure (Espindola et al 2006):…”
Section: Generation Of Hsu Through Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In unsupervised methods, intra-segment and inter-segment heterogeneity for each segment were calculated and some quality criteria were used for scoring and ranking without reference objects (Johnson et al, 2011). For instance, objective function and global score were determined to detect optimal scale parameters in unsupervised evaluation methods (Espindola et al 2006;Johnson et al, 2011;Gao et al, 2011), Being a popular scale determination tool, estimation of scale parameter (ESP) tool was developed for automated selection of scale parameter by Drăgut et al (2010). In the ESP tool, a graph is generated using local variance (LV) of image and rate of change (RoC) values of LV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%