2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter sensitivity of three Kalman filter schemes for assimilation of water levels in shelf sea models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SSKF has also been proven efficient in many applications (e.g. Heemink 1990;Canizares et al 2001;Verlaan et al 2005;Sørensen et al 2006;El Serafy and Mynett 2008;Karri et al 2014). Successful application of SSKF requires (i) a stationary observational network, (ii) a nearly linear process model and (iii) a stationary system error covariance.…”
Section: Steady-state Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SSKF has also been proven efficient in many applications (e.g. Heemink 1990;Canizares et al 2001;Verlaan et al 2005;Sørensen et al 2006;El Serafy and Mynett 2008;Karri et al 2014). Successful application of SSKF requires (i) a stationary observational network, (ii) a nearly linear process model and (iii) a stationary system error covariance.…”
Section: Steady-state Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorensen et al (2004) have also applied data assimilation in hydrodynamic modeling to deal with nonlinearlity and bias. Some people have made use of data assimilation in hydrology with a focus on uncertainty and sensitivity analysis (Liu and Gupta 2007;Sorensen et al 2006;Van Geer et al 1991;Vrugt et al 2005a). Data assimilation methods have also been used in the petroleum industry (Oliver et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard performance measure of data assimilation schemes is the root mean square error (RMSE) between the true and assimilated or perturbed solutions in a twin experiment [31]. To quantitatively represent the capability of KF or HF in handling the estimation error, we use the RMSE for each soil layer as the indicator:…”
Section: Performance Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is related to the robustness of data assimilation technique to error nature. Several studies have investigated the robustness issue of KF [21,31]. These studies showed that the KF was quite robust with respect to state estimation, but the specification of error statistics had a severe impact on the covariance estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%