2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa3528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter study for the burst mode of accretion in massive star formation

Abstract: It is now a widely held view that, in their formation and early evolution, stars build up mass in bursts. The burst mode of star formation scenario proposes that the stars grow in mass via episodic accretion of fragments migrating from their gravitationally-unstable circumstellar discs and it naturally explains the existence of observed pre-main-sequence bursts from high-mass protostars. We present a parameter study of hydrodynamical models of massive young stellar objects (MYSOs) that explores the initial mas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the brightness of MM2 has remained unchanged (Hunter et al 2017), we compute MM1's pre-outburst luminosity as L MM1preburst =2900±600 L and its outburst luminosity as L MM1burst = 47600 ± 7800 L (assuming 20% uncertainty on r preburst ). Thus, the outburst ratio is 16.3±4.4, consistent with a magnitude 3 outburst (Meyer et al 2021).…”
Section: Seds and Sed Fittingsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the brightness of MM2 has remained unchanged (Hunter et al 2017), we compute MM1's pre-outburst luminosity as L MM1preburst =2900±600 L and its outburst luminosity as L MM1burst = 47600 ± 7800 L (assuming 20% uncertainty on r preburst ). Thus, the outburst ratio is 16.3±4.4, consistent with a magnitude 3 outburst (Meyer et al 2021).…”
Section: Seds and Sed Fittingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…with the accretion rate ( Ṁacc ) increasing during outbursts while having a persistent "background" value in between outbursts (Meyer et al 2021). If we assume that half of L MM1preburst arises from a ZAMS photosphere with solar metallicity, then the progenitor's properties are: mass M * =6.7 M , radius R * =2.6 R , and effective temperature T eff =22000 K (Tout et al 1996), which lies between spectral type B1.5V and B2V (Pecaut & Mamajek 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations (e.g. Meyer et al 2021) predict that brown dwarfs and very young low-mass protostars could also be driven rapidly into the inner disc. While the mass budget of bursts observed from HMYSOs so far is in the planetary mass regime, it may be possible for a more massive object to lose only a part of its envelope if its mass-radius relation, r(M), is different from the simple power law we used here (Eq.…”
Section: Discussion and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example calculation illustrates that the planet migration may indeed be sufficiently short to transport planet-mass objects into the very inner disc during a typical HMYSO evolutionary timescale, expected to be ∼5×10 4 yr (Meyer et al 2021). Furthermore, for simplicity we assumed here that the protostar mass is M * = 15 M at the time of disc fragmentation.…”
Section: Appendix A: Planet Migration In the Disc Of Hmysomentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation