2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
284
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 400 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
284
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…During the interviews, participants are asked questions similar to the following: "Given information about the state of node X's parents, what is the probability that variable X takes state i?" (Pollino et al 2007b). This series of questions continues until all possible combinations of system states are exhausted.…”
Section: Conditional Probability Tables (Cpts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the interviews, participants are asked questions similar to the following: "Given information about the state of node X's parents, what is the probability that variable X takes state i?" (Pollino et al 2007b). This series of questions continues until all possible combinations of system states are exhausted.…”
Section: Conditional Probability Tables (Cpts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that this is a pure quantitative BN model, its evaluation should include assessments of predictive accuracy and sensitivity analysis. Predictive accuracy refers to a quantitative evaluation of the model, by comparing model predictions with observed data [62].…”
Section: Consistency and Quality Assessment Of The Bns Model And Itsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditional probabilities can also be determined by a combination of methods. For example, expert probabilities can be combined with observational data to describe outcomes of extreme events not represented in the dataset (Pollino et al, 2007). If no data is available, the values will need to be assigned through expert judgment, and when objective data become available, this can then update or replace any estimates that have been entered into the model using subjective means.…”
Section: Situation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first level is to ensure that key objects and their relationships have been represented in the model, and the second level should review the determined states to ensure that they have been defined unambiguously. There are three evaluation methods to validate the performance of a model: sensitivity analysis, data-based evaluation and non-quantitative evaluation of model outputs using experts (Pollino et al, 2007). In the event that large data sets are not available, and the probabilities must be elicited from domain experts, the sensitivity analysis technique is often used to investigate the effect of probability parameter changes on the performance of BNs.…”
Section: Situation Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%