2017 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence &Amp; Computing, Advanced &Amp; Trusted Computed, Scalable Computing &Amp; Commun 2017
DOI: 10.1109/uic-atc.2017.8397421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterising the dynamics of inter-group conflict from real world data

Abstract: Abstract-Generative modelling of inter-group relations enables probabilistic forecasting of possible conflict for scenarios where real-world data is sparse. In order for such models to have relevance and integrity, it is important to ensure that realworld data is used to parameterise the model and verify its characteristics. In this paper we investigate how real-world datasets can be mapped into generative model parameters concerning group structures and behaviours. We highlight the issues involved and present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…70 This is also true with regard to real-world data sets, 71 and understanding the relationships between visually represented actions and system parameters (e.g., real time social network metrics) in human terms is a step which is critical in aiding consistent 'tellability' and interpretation. Users with different perceptions and experiences may well be susceptible to different types of bias in making judgements on observed changes to a scenario.…”
Section: Visualisation and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…70 This is also true with regard to real-world data sets, 71 and understanding the relationships between visually represented actions and system parameters (e.g., real time social network metrics) in human terms is a step which is critical in aiding consistent 'tellability' and interpretation. Users with different perceptions and experiences may well be susceptible to different types of bias in making judgements on observed changes to a scenario.…”
Section: Visualisation and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%