2010
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-341-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterization of vertical diffusion and the atmospheric boundary layer height determination in the EMEP model

Abstract: Abstract. This paper introduces two changes of the turbulence parameterization for the EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) Eulerian air pollution model: the replacement of the Blackadar in stable and O'Brien in unstable turbulence formulations with an analytical vertical diffusion profile (K(z)) called Grisogono, and a different mixing height determination, based on a bulk Richardson number formulation (RiB). The operational or standard (STD) and proposed new parameterization for eddy diffusivi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its vertical scale is larger than the characteristic height of the low-level jet of the down-slope component. The representation of katabatic flows in numerical weather prediction models is a challenging task Jeričević et al, 2010).…”
Section: Katabatic Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its vertical scale is larger than the characteristic height of the low-level jet of the down-slope component. The representation of katabatic flows in numerical weather prediction models is a challenging task Jeričević et al, 2010).…”
Section: Katabatic Windsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model included 20 vertical grid cells with a linear grid resolution of 100 m, extending up to 2000 m a.g.l. The vertical diffusion coefficient (K z ) was calculated based on a slightly modified Grisogono scheme (Jericevic et al, 2010) so that K z in Eq. (1) depends on the height above ground (z), the friction velocity (u * ) and the height of the atmospheric boundary layer (H ):…”
Section: Adchemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was calculated through Eq. (7) by knowing: a) the estimation of daily PM 10 emission in the Municipality of Rome (VV.AA., 2013), which is close to 11.23 tons·day −1 ; b) the average height of the boundary layer (BLH) at Rome, which is of about 400 m on average according to Pichelli et al (2014) while a similar average value has been recorded in Pratica di Mare (Jeričević et al, 2010), a village adjoining the MA of Rome; c) the average C p (24.5 μg·m −3 ) recalculated by weighting the results of the ARPA (Regional Environmental Authority) monitoring stations (Arpa Lazio, 2014Lazio, , 2015 in the period September 2014-September 2015.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%