2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jd017191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterizations of some important characteristics of turbulent fluctuations and gusty wind disturbances in the atmospheric boundary layer

Abstract: [1] Parameterizations of several key characteristics of the high frequency turbulent fluctuations, the intermediate gusty wind disturbances, and their vertical profiles have been constructed with the physically based approach, and by the use of multilevel ultrasonic anemometer -thermometer observational data sets in the cold air mass. These characteristics are the kinetic energy and friction velocity of the turbulence and gust, the equivalent horizontal and vertical amplitudes and equivalent period of the gust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wind speed and relative humidity data were acquired from the PDEQ site while frequency of wind speed > 5 m/s was measured by the co-located Kestrel weather stations at each site. The frequency of high winds gives a sense of gustiness (with a consequent greater potential for particle entrainment) for the field locations while wind speed gives a sense for the event’s dust generation potential (Zeng et al, 2010; Cheng et al, 2012). Because relative humidity before and during the event is an important factor for soil moisture content, 24-hour average and event average relative humidity are compared in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wind speed and relative humidity data were acquired from the PDEQ site while frequency of wind speed > 5 m/s was measured by the co-located Kestrel weather stations at each site. The frequency of high winds gives a sense of gustiness (with a consequent greater potential for particle entrainment) for the field locations while wind speed gives a sense for the event’s dust generation potential (Zeng et al, 2010; Cheng et al, 2012). Because relative humidity before and during the event is an important factor for soil moisture content, 24-hour average and event average relative humidity are compared in Figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other motivators for this development are in large scale urban engineering, where for instance the profile of wind and gust dictates the stress profile on a large building, and similarly, in forestry. Cheng et al (2012b) address the development of improved physically-based gusts parametrisations, with an emphasis on the gust profile. Suomi et al (2013Suomi et al ( , 2015Suomi et al ( , 2016Suomi et al ( , 2017 characterise gust profiles using measurements and pursue the development of gust parametrisations in this context.…”
Section: New Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stucki et al (2016) find little difference between diagnostics when applied to a 20th century WRF model reanalysis, again over Switzerland. Interest continues in developing better physically-based gust parametrisations (Cheng et al, 2012b;Suomi et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…truew¯ is the mean vertical velocity, and w t can be obtained through equations and . The ( u g , w g ) are parameterized in the same way as in Cheng et al []: {centerug=Agucos()2normalπTgtcenterwg=Agwcos()2normalπTgt+αg where the equivalent gust amplitudes A gi ( i = u , w ) and the equivalent period T g are also parameterized through trueu¯ and α g is the arcsine of the gust coherency. A gi ( i = u , w ) and T g are summarized from Cheng et al [, ] and given in Table ; their coefficients are fitted through the observations in section 2.2, and the R 2 values of the fitting are also given in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A gi (i = u, w) and T g are summarized from Cheng et al [2014Cheng et al [ , 2015 and given in Table 1; their coefficients are fitted through the observations in section 2.2, and the R 2 values of the fitting are also given in Table 1. The fitting accuracy of the cold surge is better than that of typhoon, and more parameterization details can be seen in Cheng et al [2012bCheng et al [ , 2014Cheng et al [ , 2015.…”
Section: Lagrangian Stochastic Model Considering Gustsmentioning
confidence: 99%