In the presented paper we study the Length-Bounded Cut problem for special graph classes as well as from a parameterized-complexity viewpoint. Here, we are given a graph G, two vertices s and t, and positive integers β and λ. The task is to find a set of edges F of size at most β such that every s-t-path of length at most λ in G contains some edge in F . Bazgan et al. [3] conjectured that Length-Bounded Cut admits a polynomial-time algorithm if the input graph G is a proper interval graph. We confirm this conjecture by showing a dynamic-programming based polynomial-time algorithm. We strengthen the W[1]-hardness result of Dvořák and Knop [9]. Our reduction is shorter, seems simpler to describe, and the target of the reduction has stronger structural properties. Consequently, we give W[1]hardness for the combined parameter pathwidth and maximum degree of the input graph. Finally, we prove that Length-Bounded Cut is W[1]-hard for the feedback vertex number. Both our hardness results complement known XP algorithms.these problems have been introduced by Adámek and Koubek [1] and the Length-bounded Cut problem is formally defined as follows.
Input:An undirected graph G = (V, E), two vertices s, t, and two positive integers β, λ. Task:Decide whether there exists a subset F ⊆ E with |F | ≤ β such that there is no s-t-path in G − F of length at most λ.
Length-Bounded CutIf in the above definition one plugs-in λ = |G|, then one is left with the Edge Cut problem; a polynomial-time-solvable problem. However, Baier et al. [2] showed that the Length-Bounded Cut problem is NP-hard already for λ = 4. On the other hand, the related Length-Bounded Flow problem, where we restrict the flow to paths of length at most λ, can be solved in polynomial time via a reduction to linear programming [2,18,16]. Before we give an overview of our results, we discuss the related work with the focus on parameterized algorithms and algorithms for special graph classes.
Related WorkNote that the result of Baier et al.[2] in fact gives para-NP-hardness for Length-Bounded Cut for the parameter λ. Thus, in order to obtain tractability results one has to either consider a different parameterization or combine λ with some other parameter. The first study of Length-Bounded Cut from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity was done by Golovach and Thilikos [12]. They showed that Length-Bounded Cut is in FPT for the combined parameter β + λ. It is worth noting that parameterization by β only leads to para-NP-hardness as well [17,21]. Later, Fluschnik et al. [10] proved that it is unlikely that a polynomial kernel in β + λ exists. Dvořák and Knop [9] considered structural parameters for the Length-Bounded Cut problem. They showed that it is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the pathwidth of the input graph while it is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by treedpeth on the input graph.It is worth pointing out that Length-Bounded Cut is one of just a few problems with such a parameterized dichotomy. Kolman [15] gave an O (λ τ • |G|)-time algorithm f...