2003 European Control Conference (ECC) 2003
DOI: 10.23919/ecc.2003.7084989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterized H<inf>∞</inf> controller design for adaptative trade-off by finite dimensional LMI optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This point is a dramatic improvement with respect to previous approaches, e.g. (Dinh et al, 2003): we improve this approach by deriving conditions of similar complexity. The proposed approach can be applied to several parameters but by introducing conservatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This point is a dramatic improvement with respect to previous approaches, e.g. (Dinh et al, 2003): we improve this approach by deriving conditions of similar complexity. The proposed approach can be applied to several parameters but by introducing conservatism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this paper, we focus on the design of a parameter dependent H ∞ controller for a parameter dependent plant. This problem can be applied to numerous controller design problems: gain scheduling control (Stilwell and Rugh, 1999), saturated system control (Megretski, 1996), spatial system control (de Castro and Paganini, 2002), trade-off dependent control (Dinh et al, 2003), to cite a few. It can be naturally cast into optimization problems involving parameter dependent Linear Matrix Inequalities, that is, an infinite dimensional optimization problem whose solution cannot be efficiently computed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A parameter-dependent algebraic Riccati equation (PDRE) often arises in the design of controllers such as gain scheduling control (Apkarian et al, 1995), (Stilwell et al, 1999), saturated system control (Megretski, 1996), and trade-off dependent control (Dinh et al, 2003), (Dinh et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%