2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4073(00)00103-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterized scattering matrices for small particles in planetary atmospheres

Abstract: Parameterized matrices are discussed that may be used as (single) scattering matrices for interpretations of the brightness and polarization of planetary atmospheres containing randomly oriented small particles. A number of guidelines are developed for the construction of such matrices. These guidelines are based on (i) physical conditions for the elements of a natural scattering matrix, some holding for arbitrary scattering angles and some for the exact forward and backward scattering directions only, as well… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The computations based on Equation (16) could be CPU-intensive if used in vast modeling. Therefore, some convenient approximations, such as the Henyey–Greenstein function [53],are routinely applied in the use of radiative transfer tools. Although this function has no theoretical foundation, it can mimic the experimental scattering patterns quite well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computations based on Equation (16) could be CPU-intensive if used in vast modeling. Therefore, some convenient approximations, such as the Henyey–Greenstein function [53],are routinely applied in the use of radiative transfer tools. Although this function has no theoretical foundation, it can mimic the experimental scattering patterns quite well.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] In an important enhancement to the instrumentation, we are currently modifying the optical scattering detection scheme to include a computer-controlled rotation stage in order to measure the angular dependence of the scattered light in the XY detection plane (i.e., as a function of q in Figure 5 from q $ 0°to $ 175°). From the angular dependence of light scattering, the size distribution and the complex index of refraction of the particles (at the wavelength of incident light) may be computed [see, e.g., Volten et al, 2001;Braak et al, 2001]. Until this modification is tested and calibrated, against an aerosol of known chemical composition and size distribution, for example, we estimate here a monodisperse particle size and number density that could produce the magnitude of scattering Production Rate, molecules cm À3 s À1 H 2 5.7 ± 1.1 Á 10 15 9.9 ± 2.2 Á 10 11 C 2 H 2 5.9 ± 1.1 Á 10 13 2.8 ± 0.8 Á 10 10 C 2 H 4 6.3 ± 1.0 Á 10 14 5.5 ± 9.4 Á 10 9 C 2 H 6 2.6 ± 4.3 Á 10 15 8.6 ± 2.5 Á 10 10 C 3 H 4 6.3 ± 1.2 Á 10 13 2.5 ± 1.2 Á 10 9 C 4 H 2 2.6 ± 6.1 Á 10 13 6.6 ± 5.0 Á 10 8 C 4 H 10 1.4 ± 3.3 Á 10 14 1.3 ± 0.5 Á 10 10 (C-C) particles -7.5 ± 3.1 Á 10 11 signal shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Optical Scattering Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerosol scaleheight is about 1.7 km, while a value of 8 km is considered for air molecules. The scattering phase function of an elementary volume of the molecular–aerosol atmosphere is computed as the weighted contribution of both constituents; here the molecular scattering is simulated in accordance with Rayleigh theory, and aerosol scattering is approximated by the Henyey–Greenstein (HG) function (Braak et al 2001). Note that aerosol particles typically have non‐spherical shapes (Shimizu et al 2004; Rajeev et al 2010).…”
Section: Experimental Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%