2020
DOI: 10.1306/04241918149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameterizing parasequences: Importance of shelf gradient, shoreline trajectory, sediment supply, and autoretreat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of parasequence ‘sand fraction’ (cf. Ainsworth et al ., , ) are computed based on the ratio between the maximum observed thickness of the parasequence shallow‐water sand belt and the maximum observed thickness of the parasequence (Fig. A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Values of parasequence ‘sand fraction’ (cf. Ainsworth et al ., , ) are computed based on the ratio between the maximum observed thickness of the parasequence shallow‐water sand belt and the maximum observed thickness of the parasequence (Fig. A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of parasequence ‘thickness to sand‐fraction’ ratios (cf. T/SF ratio of Ainsworth et al ., , ) are also computed accordingly, meaning that these metrics differ substantially from the T/SF ratios of Ainsworth et al . (, ), in two ways: (i) the downdip variability in volumetric sand fractions within individual parasequences is not characterized: estimations of sand fractions are less accurate than they would be if it was (as done by Ainsworth et al ., , ); (ii) the maximum, rather than the mean, parasequence thickness is considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations