2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2017.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters Affecting the Enhanced Permeability and Retention Effect: The Need for Patient Selection

Abstract: The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect constitutes the rationale by which nanotechnologies selectively target drugs to tumors. Despite promising preclinical and clinical results, these technologies have, in our view, underachieved compared to their potential, possibly due to a suboptimal exploitation of the EPR effect. Here, we have systematically analyzed clinical data to identify key parameters affecting the extent of the EPR effect. An analysis of 17 clinical studies showed that the magnitude … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
76
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, sufficiently small nanoparticles (<200 nm) would cross the hyperpermeable tumor blood vessels (enhanced permeability) and accumulate within the tumor parenchyma due to the lack of lymphatic drainage (retention). However, clinical and pre-clinical studies are starting to demonstrate the significant variability of the EPR effect within patients and along the overall development of the disease (Natfji et al, 2017). As such, relying exclusively on the EPR effect to reach the malignant tissue may not always be a successful strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, sufficiently small nanoparticles (<200 nm) would cross the hyperpermeable tumor blood vessels (enhanced permeability) and accumulate within the tumor parenchyma due to the lack of lymphatic drainage (retention). However, clinical and pre-clinical studies are starting to demonstrate the significant variability of the EPR effect within patients and along the overall development of the disease (Natfji et al, 2017). As such, relying exclusively on the EPR effect to reach the malignant tissue may not always be a successful strategy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most pronounced EPR effect was observed in pancreatic, colon, breast, and stomach cancers. Also, a higher accumulation of nanoparticles was found in larger tumors [39].…”
Section: Synthetic Nanocarriersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The magnitude of the EPR effect in humans highly depends on the particularities of the patient and the tumor [113] although some alternative strategies, such as tumor-homing peptides or some types of cells, are currently being explored to overcome the lack of EPR effect.…”
Section: Nanotechnology For Cancer Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%