2022
DOI: 10.3390/ma15113776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameters Identification of Rubber-like Hyperelastic Material Based on General Regression Neural Network

Abstract: In this study, we present a systematic scheme to identify the material parameters in constitutive model of hyperelastic materials such as rubber. This approach is proposed based on the combined use of general regression neural network, experimental data and finite element analysis. In detail, the finite element analysis is carried out to provide the learning samples of GRNN model, while the results observed from the uniaxial tensile test is set as the target value of GRNN model. A problem involving parameters … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed residual errors in the hybrid numerical-experimental identification process hence were fully consistent with the level of uncertainty normally entailed by FEMU-based characterization. Optically measured (d) Remarkably, HS-JAYA solved variants 1 and 2 of the identification problem including, respectively, 324 and 110 unknown material/structural parameters, a significantly larger number of unknowns than those usually reported in the literature for elastomers and rubberlike materials [66][67][68][69][70][71][72] (from two to six unknown material parameters or neural networks depending on three input characteristics), visco-hyperelastic materials [73][74][75] (from six to nine unknown material parameters including tangent modulus and softening index, Prony constants and relaxation times), biological tissues [76][77][78][79][80][81] (from five to sixteen unknowns accounting also for visco-elastic effects and stochastic variation of material properties), non-homogeneous hyperelastic structures [37,63,[82][83][84] (from four to sixteen unknown material parameters for the global model, or two unknown material parameters for each local inverse problem at the element level) or anisotropic hyperelastic materials modeled with much more complicated constitutive equations [27,34,[84][85][86] (from three to seventeen unknown material parameters). A very recent study by Borzeszkowski et al [38] considered identification problems of nonlinear shells subject to various loading conditions (i.e., uniaxial tension, pure bending, sheet inflation and abdominal wall pressurization).…”
Section: Solution Of the Inverse Problem: Fe Analysis And Metaheurist...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed residual errors in the hybrid numerical-experimental identification process hence were fully consistent with the level of uncertainty normally entailed by FEMU-based characterization. Optically measured (d) Remarkably, HS-JAYA solved variants 1 and 2 of the identification problem including, respectively, 324 and 110 unknown material/structural parameters, a significantly larger number of unknowns than those usually reported in the literature for elastomers and rubberlike materials [66][67][68][69][70][71][72] (from two to six unknown material parameters or neural networks depending on three input characteristics), visco-hyperelastic materials [73][74][75] (from six to nine unknown material parameters including tangent modulus and softening index, Prony constants and relaxation times), biological tissues [76][77][78][79][80][81] (from five to sixteen unknowns accounting also for visco-elastic effects and stochastic variation of material properties), non-homogeneous hyperelastic structures [37,63,[82][83][84] (from four to sixteen unknown material parameters for the global model, or two unknown material parameters for each local inverse problem at the element level) or anisotropic hyperelastic materials modeled with much more complicated constitutive equations [27,34,[84][85][86] (from three to seventeen unknown material parameters). A very recent study by Borzeszkowski et al [38] considered identification problems of nonlinear shells subject to various loading conditions (i.e., uniaxial tension, pure bending, sheet inflation and abdominal wall pressurization).…”
Section: Solution Of the Inverse Problem: Fe Analysis And Metaheurist...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trial-and-error method was, for example, used to determine the spread constant σ of the GRNN model to predict the curing characteristics of RBs in our earlier work [7]. A cross-validation method for the GRNN optimisation was employed in article [31], which was dedicated to the identification of material parameters in the constitutive model of hyper-elastic materials such as rubber. A hold-out method of selecting the optimal value of σ was proposed in [22].…”
Section: Generalised Regression Neural Network Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GRNN Model. In 1991, Specht [26] proposed generalized regression neural network (GRNN), which is a special form of radial basis function neural network (RBF) [27].…”
Section: Ifoa-grnn Model Designmentioning
confidence: 99%