2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.90.134505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric amplification of vortex-antivortex pair generation in a Josephson junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distribution of magnetic fluxes in the Josephson junction gives the important information of Josephson vortices, and is one of the main subjects of studies of the Josephson effect [19,20,21,22,23,24]. For the vortex-vortex interaction in the frustrated case, a remarkable consequence of the change of vacuum structure can be seen in the magnetic flux:…”
Section: Ground Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distribution of magnetic fluxes in the Josephson junction gives the important information of Josephson vortices, and is one of the main subjects of studies of the Josephson effect [19,20,21,22,23,24]. For the vortex-vortex interaction in the frustrated case, a remarkable consequence of the change of vacuum structure can be seen in the magnetic flux:…”
Section: Ground Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of Josephson vortices can be described by the sine-Gordon model [14,15,16,17,18]. On the other hand, studies of the vortices in various complex setups are frequently done by using the simulations of the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) model: 3D GL calculation in anisotropic mesoscopic superconductors [19], vortex-antivortex pair generation in the presence of applied electric current [20], time-dependent calculation of the vortices under an external source [21,22,23,24], and so on. Josephson vortex is not a mere conceptual object in theoretical physics, but a detectable one: it is directly observed by using scanning tunneling microscopy on the surface of Si(111)-( √ 7 × √ 3)-In [25] and in a lateral superconductor-normal-superconductor (SNS) network of superconducting Pb nanocrystals linked together by an atomically thin Pb wetting layer [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability range of the rectangular array of the vortices can be further increased by introducing an ordered array of pinning centers [26,27]. The pinning can be created by structural defects, which change the Josephson tunneling distance locally [12], or, alternatively, by forming pancake vortices at inclined magnetic fields [28]. The latter serves as magnetic pinning centers [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, considerable efforts have been devoted to the study of the dynamics of Josephson vortices (fluxons) in stacks of Josephson junctions (JJs) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This is, e.g., motivated by its potential to use such Josephson systems for creating high-frequency electromagnetic oscillations (see Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the interaction between vortices and sample boundaries, vortex configurations strongly dependent on the size and geometry of mesoscopic samples whose dimensions are of the order of the penetration depth λ or the coherence length ξ. For example, strong confinement leads to the formation of the giant vortex state [3][4][5][6][7] and multivortex state [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], which are energetically less favorable in bulk type-II superconductors [15]. The vortex-antivortex states are easily stabilized in an inhomogeneous magnetic field [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%