2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Approaches in Population Pharmacokinetics

Abstract: Population pharmacokinetic (popPK) approaches have spread widely throughout clinical pharmacology research, and every clinician should have some understanding of them. After a general introduction on the fundamentals and fields of application of these approaches, this review focuses on parametric popPK methods to provide the clinicians with the conceptual tools to interpret appropriately the results of parametric popPK analyses and to understand their clinical utility. The emphasis is put on the clinical quest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To interpret the residual variability, knowledge about the assay parameters is key: For a good model, the magnitude of the residual error should lie within the margin of the analytical error. To account for interindividual variability, both parametric 41 and nonparametric approaches 42 are used. The main difference is the use of a defined distribution of PK parameters in the case of the parametric approaches, whereas in the case of nonparametric approaches so‐called support points are estimated from the clinical data, which do not make distribution assumptions.…”
Section: From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring To Model‐informed Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To interpret the residual variability, knowledge about the assay parameters is key: For a good model, the magnitude of the residual error should lie within the margin of the analytical error. To account for interindividual variability, both parametric 41 and nonparametric approaches 42 are used. The main difference is the use of a defined distribution of PK parameters in the case of the parametric approaches, whereas in the case of nonparametric approaches so‐called support points are estimated from the clinical data, which do not make distribution assumptions.…”
Section: From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring To Model‐informed Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference is the use of a defined distribution of PK parameters in the case of the parametric approaches, whereas in the case of nonparametric approaches so‐called support points are estimated from the clinical data, which do not make distribution assumptions. For a detailed review of either approach, the reader is referred to two comprehensive reviews 41,42 . More research, beyond simulation studies, is necessary to compare the predictive performance of both approaches in real‐world data when future drug exposure is predicted in the context of MIPD.…”
Section: From Therapeutic Drug Monitoring To Model‐informed Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More details on the strengths and limitations of each method are provided in the 2 previously mentioned papers on P and NP methods 1,2 …”
Section: General Questions On Both Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 separate articles, we have reviewed the characteristics of parametric (P) and nonparametric (NP) approaches in population pharmacokinetics (popPK) 1,2 . The aim of this third article is to answer some frequently asked questions that are raised by scholars, clinicians, and researchers interested in popPK and model‐informed precision dosing (MIPD).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%