2016
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2016.2578938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Bootstrap Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Imperfect Maintenance Models

Abstract: International audienceThe simultaneous modeling of ageing and maintenance efficiency of repairable systems is a major issue in reliability. Many imperfect maintenance models have been proposed. To analyze a dataset, it is necessary to check whether these models are adapted or not. In this paper, we propose a general methodology for testing the goodness of fit of any kind of imperfect maintenance model. Two families of tests are presented, based respectively on martingale residuals and probability integral tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We need to know whether a given imperfect maintenance model is adapted or not to a given data set. The authors in Chauvel et al (2016a) developed Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) tests to address this issue. This work has been presented at MIMAR 2016 (see Chauvel et al (2016b)).…”
Section: Goodness-of-fit Tests: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We need to know whether a given imperfect maintenance model is adapted or not to a given data set. The authors in Chauvel et al (2016a) developed Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) tests to address this issue. This work has been presented at MIMAR 2016 (see Chauvel et al (2016b)).…”
Section: Goodness-of-fit Tests: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in Chauvel et al (2016a) developed Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) tests to address this issue. This work has been presented at MIMAR 2016 (see Chauvel et al (2016b)). However, they have not considered multi-system data.…”
Section: Goodness-of-fit Tests: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations