2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10836-015-5534-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Built-In Test for 65nm RF LNA Using Non-Intrusive Variation-Aware Sensors

Abstract: International audienceTesting the RF functions of systems-on-chip incurs a very high cost. Built-in test is a promising alternative to facilitate testing and reduce cost. However, designing built-in test circuits that tap into the sensitive RF signal paths, in order to extract useful information for the purpose of testing, often finds the designers reluctant since it results in some performance degradation that needs to be accounted for during the design. In this paper, we study a transparent built-in test app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All fault-free circuits that fail the threshold detection test is assumed to be part of P(YL), and all faulty circuits that pass the test is assumed to be part of P(TE). Due to this conservative approach, the test escape that correspond to the best FoM (0.953) at P(TE) = 5•10 -2 is much worse in this study than that of an optimized P(TE) = 9.09•10 -4 from [16] and P(TE) = 1.98•10 -4 from [60]. Due to the CI choice of 0.9, the yield loss that correspond to the best FoM in this study is high at P(YL) = 1.89•10 -2 compared to that of P(YL)= 9.1•10 -3 from [16] and P(YL) = 1.98• 10 -4 from [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All fault-free circuits that fail the threshold detection test is assumed to be part of P(YL), and all faulty circuits that pass the test is assumed to be part of P(TE). Due to this conservative approach, the test escape that correspond to the best FoM (0.953) at P(TE) = 5•10 -2 is much worse in this study than that of an optimized P(TE) = 9.09•10 -4 from [16] and P(TE) = 1.98•10 -4 from [60]. Due to the CI choice of 0.9, the yield loss that correspond to the best FoM in this study is high at P(YL) = 1.89•10 -2 compared to that of P(YL)= 9.1•10 -3 from [16] and P(YL) = 1.98• 10 -4 from [60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Numerous approaches to analogue [6]- [8] and RF [9]- [15] built-in self-testing (BIST) have been proposed, with most of the state-of-the-art techniques relying on indirect parameter measurement using nonintrusive sensors [16] or predictive modelling [17], whereas the classical approaches [18] require the application of some test stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach of indirect testing has been largely studied in the literature over the past twenty years [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. The general objective is to find solutions to improve the accuracy of the correlation between IMs and RF performances of the circuit and to ensure a good robustness of the prediction during the production testing phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%