2019
DOI: 10.1080/00038628.2019.1704395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric design of diagrid tall buildings regarding structural efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the meantime, parametric design has various applications in architecture: conservation [29], restoration [30], urbanism [31], landscape planning [32], green building [33], wind-based design [34], prefabricated buildings [35], wooden structures [36], design exploration [37], emulate patterns [38], analyzing performance [39], building structure analyses [40], visual comfort [41], and BIM [8]. It can also help to create less ecological damages: structural efficiency [42], sustainable building renovation [43], daylighting [44], and energy-efficient building form [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, parametric design has various applications in architecture: conservation [29], restoration [30], urbanism [31], landscape planning [32], green building [33], wind-based design [34], prefabricated buildings [35], wooden structures [36], design exploration [37], emulate patterns [38], analyzing performance [39], building structure analyses [40], visual comfort [41], and BIM [8]. It can also help to create less ecological damages: structural efficiency [42], sustainable building renovation [43], daylighting [44], and energy-efficient building form [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies regarding this topic show the tendency to investigate diagrid models having different or irregular plan shapes and different structural analysis methods or tools in order to analyze these models. In Ardekani et al, [10] the structural efficiency of diagrid tall buildings was compared due to different plan shapes (triangle, hexagon, circle, etc.) and height section types (concave, convex, and regular) while having the same diagrid geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the design variables, that is, diagonal angle and bending ductility to shear ratio, it is not possible, even for a particular case study, to predict the “dominant” approach, that is, whether the overall stiffness demand is dominating the design approach or the member's strength resistance. [ 12,13 ] An axial force is the major internal force in diagonal members, and the preliminary design of diagrids based on axial force is a logical assumption. Current design codes also do not provide any specific values for diagrid ductility, overresistance, and response correction factors, and using the smallest values for these factors is largely conservative for diagrids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%