2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric finite element investigation of the critical load capacity of elastomeric strip bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several papers on stability problems, also very recent (Buckle et al 2002;Warn and Weisman 2011;Weisman and Warn 2012;Sanchez et al 2013;Masroor et al 2012;Han et al 2013), refer to rubber bearings with very low values of both S 1 and S 2 (S 1 = 5.5-10; S 2 = 1.8-2.5), which seem neither realistic nor feasible in actual design solutions; further the importance of S 2 in affecting the stability of the bearings is not specifically addressed: as a matter of fact, the value of S 2 for the tested/analyzed bearings is not explicitly given in the papers and is not accounted for in the interpretation and discussion of the experimental and numerical outcomes.…”
Section: Values Of S 1 and S 2 In Rbs (And Related Research)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several papers on stability problems, also very recent (Buckle et al 2002;Warn and Weisman 2011;Weisman and Warn 2012;Sanchez et al 2013;Masroor et al 2012;Han et al 2013), refer to rubber bearings with very low values of both S 1 and S 2 (S 1 = 5.5-10; S 2 = 1.8-2.5), which seem neither realistic nor feasible in actual design solutions; further the importance of S 2 in affecting the stability of the bearings is not specifically addressed: as a matter of fact, the value of S 2 for the tested/analyzed bearings is not explicitly given in the papers and is not accounted for in the interpretation and discussion of the experimental and numerical outcomes.…”
Section: Values Of S 1 and S 2 In Rbs (And Related Research)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the influence of S 1 on the buckling capacity has been recognized and widely studied both experimentally and numerically (Buckle and Liu 1994;Takayama and Morita 2012;Han et al 2013;Sanchez et al 2013;Weisman and Warn 2012;Warn and Weisman 2011), the effect of S 2 has not been comparably explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Buckle et al investigated the critical load of elastomeric bearings and Warn et al expressed the relationship between the vertical stiffness and the overlapping area of elastomeric bearings . Warn et al performed parametric finite element analyses, and suggested that the critical load capacity is influenced by not only the overlapping area, but also the shape factor of the bearing and Weisman et al conducted experimental tests and finite element analyses, and showed that the overlapping area method is a conservative estimation . In addition, Ohsaki et al performed finite element analyses for a building frame supported by rubber bearings which showed that the vertical pressure concentrates at the overlapping area .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding Lan et al (2017) analysed the mechanical properties of laminated rubber bearings based on transfer matrix method. Warn and Weisman (2011) studied the effect of geometric parameters such as rubber thickness and number of rubber layers on the critical load of elastomeric strip bearings under compression and shear deformation. However, all the above studies of the elastomeric bearing are based on Haringx's equivalent column model while the inner steel shims are assumed as rigid body and uniform in thickness, therefore, the deformation of steel shims and the stress distribution on steel shims are ignored, focusing only on stress and strain on the rubber layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%