2018
DOI: 10.7837/kosomes.2018.24.3.352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Investigation of BOG Generation for Ship-to-Ship LNG Bunkering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8⋅4%). One plausible explanation is that, during the ballast legs, the temperature in the cargo tanks must be the correct one to receive LNG to minimise thermal stresses while minimising BOG generation (Lu et al., 2016; Shao et al., 2018). This cooling procedure adds time to the ballast leg, as seen in Figure 3, for the berthing time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8⋅4%). One plausible explanation is that, during the ballast legs, the temperature in the cargo tanks must be the correct one to receive LNG to minimise thermal stresses while minimising BOG generation (Lu et al., 2016; Shao et al., 2018). This cooling procedure adds time to the ballast leg, as seen in Figure 3, for the berthing time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the initial design considerations, the minimum filling ratio of 10% can be assumed as a rule of thumb. The amount of LNG remaining in the tank directly affects the tank's pressure and temperature and the bunkering process [26]. When the amount of LNG is insufficient to maintain the tank at a critical temperature, bunkering thermal shock can occur in the LNG fuel tank because of the significant temperature difference between the tank atmosphere and charged LNG [27].…”
Section: Sph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few ships may require a shorter bunkering time when compared to others based on their operating profile. Based on the frequency of bunkering and the size of the fuel tanks, the owners may wish to maximize the bunkering rate [32].…”
Section: Lng Flow Rate and Total Lng Bunkering Amountmentioning
confidence: 99%