2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric modeling of autogenous shrinkage of sodium silicate-activated slag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, a few authors indicated that the contribution of capillary pressure cannot explain totally basic shrinkage and that other mechanisms should be considered as the reduction of steric-hydration force 33 and creep effects. 36 Moreover, the contribution of drying shrinkage, defined as the difference between experimental results in unsealed conditions and sealed conditions is relatively low in comparison to OPC concrete. For example, in the B3 model, 14,15 only drying shrinkage is taken into account and basic shrinkage is neglected.…”
Section: Experimental Shrinkage Results Of Aas Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, a few authors indicated that the contribution of capillary pressure cannot explain totally basic shrinkage and that other mechanisms should be considered as the reduction of steric-hydration force 33 and creep effects. 36 Moreover, the contribution of drying shrinkage, defined as the difference between experimental results in unsealed conditions and sealed conditions is relatively low in comparison to OPC concrete. For example, in the B3 model, 14,15 only drying shrinkage is taken into account and basic shrinkage is neglected.…”
Section: Experimental Shrinkage Results Of Aas Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the capillary pressure in AAS concrete is higher and causes a higher basic shrinkage. Nevertheless, a few authors indicated that the contribution of capillary pressure cannot explain totally basic shrinkage and that other mechanisms should be considered as the reduction of steric‐hydration force 33 and creep effects 36 . Moreover, the contribution of drying shrinkage, defined as the difference between experimental results in unsealed conditions and sealed conditions is relatively low in comparison to OPC concrete.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%