2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-03818-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric optimization of fused deposition modeling using learning enthusiasm enabled teaching learning based algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the above-discussed methods, there are also other methods used for optimizing process parameters of FDM. For instance, enabled teaching learning based algorithms [75] and particle swarm optimization [76][77][78] were employed to optimize the process parameters of FDM in order to enhance the quality of the manufactured parts.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the above-discussed methods, there are also other methods used for optimizing process parameters of FDM. For instance, enabled teaching learning based algorithms [75] and particle swarm optimization [76][77][78] were employed to optimize the process parameters of FDM in order to enhance the quality of the manufactured parts.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outcome can be attributed to the reduction in thermal stress due to the higher glass transition temperature exhibited by the printed samples compared to the filament used. Chohan [27] utilized the Learning Enthusiasm based teaching-learning algorithm (LebTLBO) to optimize four printing factors and enhance the warping deformation of ABS components. In a separate study, Messimer et al [28] examined the warping deformation of ten different materials by two types of heated plates: an aluminum-polycarbonate (AL-PC) composite and pure glass or aluminum plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of adeptly adjusting FDM process parameters for specific goals was underscored by Rayegani and Onwubolu [10], who effectively achieved desired tensile strength using the Differential Evolution (DE) optimization algorithm. Chohan et al [11] have employed the advanced Learning Enthusiasm-based teachinglearning algorithm (LebTLBO). The study aimed to identify optimal input parameters for minimizing dimensional accuracy deviations, warp deformations, and manufacturing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%