2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-04133-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric Study and Comparison of Aerodynamics Momentum-Based Models for Straight-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second shortcoming of this work is the lack of a dynamic stall model in the aerodynamic part, which is the main reason for the discrepancy between the modeling results and experimental data at low tip speed ratios. However, it was shown in previous work [34] that using the DMST model with tip loss correction can only predict the aerodynamic loads with high accuracy. Moreover, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second shortcoming of this work is the lack of a dynamic stall model in the aerodynamic part, which is the main reason for the discrepancy between the modeling results and experimental data at low tip speed ratios. However, it was shown in previous work [34] that using the DMST model with tip loss correction can only predict the aerodynamic loads with high accuracy. Moreover, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Though they have higher deformation, SB-VAWTs permit the size of the rotor to be reduced to a reasonable value for a specified performance. It was found in previous work [34], that starting from an aspect ratio of around one and reducing the diameter of the SB-VAWT significantly improve the performance and enhance the peak power, emphasizing the suitability of straight blade turbines for small rotor sizes and low wind situations. Finally, the geometric simplicity and low manufacturing cost may compensate for the high bending moments issue [38,43].…”
Section: Structural Displacement Due To Aerodynamic Forces Onlymentioning
confidence: 92%