2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is because, at higher rotational speed, the centripetal force "mω 2 r" (where m is the mass of particle, ω is the angular speed of the tool rotation, and r is radial distance of particle from center of tool) available for holding the particles in the chain becomes insufficient resulting in breaking of the chains. This breaking of chains causes a decrease in the finishing force resulting in a drop in %ΔR a [27,30]. With an increase in the abrasive weight percentage, the number of abrasive particles per unit area increases, so more numbers of cutting edges are available to perform the finishing operation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is because, at higher rotational speed, the centripetal force "mω 2 r" (where m is the mass of particle, ω is the angular speed of the tool rotation, and r is radial distance of particle from center of tool) available for holding the particles in the chain becomes insufficient resulting in breaking of the chains. This breaking of chains causes a decrease in the finishing force resulting in a drop in %ΔR a [27,30]. With an increase in the abrasive weight percentage, the number of abrasive particles per unit area increases, so more numbers of cutting edges are available to perform the finishing operation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions were found for working gaps smaller than 0.5 mm because of the restrained space, which compromises abrasive renovation. Singh et al [53] applied Taguchi's design of experiments to determine important parameters influencing the surface quality generated. Experimental results indicated that for a change in surface roughness, the voltage and the working gap were found to be the most significant parameters, followed by the grain mesh number and the rotational speed.…”
Section: Working Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provision is also made to record the data in ASCII format. The dynamometer has been pre-calibrated [13] using standard procedure and a conversion factor has been determined to calculate the imparted force from the strain value measured.…”
Section: Response Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hard materials like ceramics can be finished better by using composite magnetic abrasive particles (normal MAF powder plus diamond particles). Singh et al [13] studied the effect of electromagnet input voltage, working gap, revolutions per minute (RPM) of electromagnet, and mesh number of SiC abrasive particles on the surface finish and material removal in case of a ferromagnetic material. They concluded that voltage and working gap are the parameters that influence surface finish more than the RPM and the mesh number of abrasive particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%