2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.027
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study of using only static response in structural damage detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The method proposed by Abdo (2012) can be used for damage location from static measurements. The major disadvantage of this method is that damage is detected from comparison between damaged and undamaged structures.…”
Section: Comparison Among Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method proposed by Abdo (2012) can be used for damage location from static measurements. The major disadvantage of this method is that damage is detected from comparison between damaged and undamaged structures.…”
Section: Comparison Among Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next issue is that modal data for some stiff civil structures are difficult to be measured accurately, especially for high-order modes. In view of this, the static detection algorithms [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] also attracted much attention in civil engineering area in recent years due to their simplicity for implementation. However, most of these methods need a detailed finite element model (FEM) or the baseline parameters of the intact system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, measurement errors are assumed to follow the normal distribution with zero mean. [6,34] One way to mitigate the adverse effect of measurement errors is to use weight factors. [5] Each displacement was measured repeatedly, and the variance in those measured values was calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%