2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study on seismic ground response by finite element modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amorosi et al [13] presented a new procedure to specify frequency interval in order to obtain a better match between the linear time domain and frequency domain analyses whereas, the first natural frequency (f 1 ) is selected as f m . The value of f n should be selected equal to the frequency where the amplification function gets lower than unity.…”
Section: Calibration Of Damping Ratio For Nonlinear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Amorosi et al [13] presented a new procedure to specify frequency interval in order to obtain a better match between the linear time domain and frequency domain analyses whereas, the first natural frequency (f 1 ) is selected as f m . The value of f n should be selected equal to the frequency where the amplification function gets lower than unity.…”
Section: Calibration Of Damping Ratio For Nonlinear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciro Visone et al [12] presented a comparative study on frequency and time domain analyses for the evaluation of the seismic response of subsoil to the earthquake shaking by different computer programs. Amorosi et al [13] performed 2D finite element analysis of seismic ground response of a clayey deposit, using linear viscoelastic and visco-elsto-plastic constitutive models, the viscous and linear elastic parameters are selected according to a novel calibration strategy, leading to FE results comparable to those obtained by 1D equivalent-linear visco-elastic frequencydomain analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…in Borja and Chao (1999) [5]) and Finite Element (FE) column models (e.g. in Li et al (1998) [24]; Lee et al (2006) [23]; Amorosi et al (2010) [1]). Among the existing approaches for site response analysis, the FE method is the most versatile, as it allows the implementation of advanced constitutive models which can simulate realistically soil behaviour under seismic loading, the rigorous modelling of soil's fluid phase through hydro-mechanical (HM) coupling and the computation of the response in all three directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%