2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric study to develop guidelines for blast fragmentation improvement in jointed and massive formations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lu (1997) proposed models for the transition of the size distribution of the initial rock mass to the size distribution of the fragments after blasting. Alternative approaches include the use of Rock Engineering Systems (RES) to study the influence of each controlling parameter of the fragmentation phenomenon by blasting and predict the resultant fragment size distribution (Faramarzi et al 2013), multivariate analysis (Aler et al 1996, Chakraborty et al 2004, Monte Carlo simulations (Morin and Ficarazzo, 2006) or neural network and artificial intelligence methods (Kutilake et al 2010, Monjezi et al 2009, Saavedra et al 2006). …”
Section: Obtaining the Bsd From The Ibsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu (1997) proposed models for the transition of the size distribution of the initial rock mass to the size distribution of the fragments after blasting. Alternative approaches include the use of Rock Engineering Systems (RES) to study the influence of each controlling parameter of the fragmentation phenomenon by blasting and predict the resultant fragment size distribution (Faramarzi et al 2013), multivariate analysis (Aler et al 1996, Chakraborty et al 2004, Monte Carlo simulations (Morin and Ficarazzo, 2006) or neural network and artificial intelligence methods (Kutilake et al 2010, Monjezi et al 2009, Saavedra et al 2006). …”
Section: Obtaining the Bsd From The Ibsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variables have been discussed by many authors (Lu & Latham, 1998;Thornton et al, 2002;Mancini & Cardu, 2001;Chakraborty et al, 2004. ) following a general classification that includes: I) geometrical variables (drilling pattern and bench geometry); II) explosive variables; III) initiation system variables; and IV) rock parameters.…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important challenge is the high degree of uncertainty posed by local geological conditions. In practical situations, due to structural conditions (Grenon et al, 1998;Lu & Latham, 1998, Chakraborty et al, 2004, the cost curves, and hence the optimum conditions, vary from bench to bench. Nevertheless, aiming at industrial level productivity, a robust pre-defined blast design must be used to drive the subsequent operations, with minimal adjustments if any.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable and uniform particle size distribution results increase in crusher and mill throughput and decrease in energy consumption in size reduction process. Mckenzie (1966) found, in the studies at Quebec Cartier Mines, that the efficiency of all the subsystems of mining is dependent on the fragmentation (Chakraborty et al 2004). Today, researchers suggest 'mine to mill' blasting approach that is defined as optimization of the blast design to maximize the overall profitability rather than individual operations (Kanchibotla et al 1999;Grundstrom et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%