1980
DOI: 10.2307/1998067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametrizations of G δ -Valued Multifunctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the maps f(t, ■) in Theorem 2.2 are 1-1, continuous maps, they are, a fortiori, Borel isomorphisms. We have therefore obtained the "Borel parametrization" result of Srivastava and Sarbadhikari [10] for such multifunctions when they take values in (topologically) one-dimensional Polish spaces. However, our proof appears to be more "effective" as it does not go into the Schroder-Bernstein kind of argument employed there.…”
Section: I) For Each T G T F(t ■ ) Is a Homeomorphism O/2 And F(t)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As the maps f(t, ■) in Theorem 2.2 are 1-1, continuous maps, they are, a fortiori, Borel isomorphisms. We have therefore obtained the "Borel parametrization" result of Srivastava and Sarbadhikari [10] for such multifunctions when they take values in (topologically) one-dimensional Polish spaces. However, our proof appears to be more "effective" as it does not go into the Schroder-Bernstein kind of argument employed there.…”
Section: I) For Each T G T F(t ■ ) Is a Homeomorphism O/2 And F(t)mentioning
confidence: 98%