2013
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2013.17.639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametrized ring-spectra and the nearby Lagrangian conjecture

Abstract: Abstract:We prove that any closed connected exact Lagrangian manifold L in a connected cotangent bundle T * N is up to a finite covering space lift a homology equivalence. We prove this by constructing a fibrant parametrized family of ring spectra FL parametrized by the manifold N . The homology of FL will be (twisted) symplectic cohomology of T * L. The fibrancy property will imply that there is a Serre spectral sequence converging to the homology of FL and the product combined with intersection product on N … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
78
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining this theorem with the results by Abouzaid-Kragh [1], [33], we obtain a positive answer to the nearby Lagrangian conjecture for (T * T 2 , dλ), i.e. this establishes Theorem B.…”
Section: The Nearby Lagrangian Conjecturesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combining this theorem with the results by Abouzaid-Kragh [1], [33], we obtain a positive answer to the nearby Lagrangian conjecture for (T * T 2 , dλ), i.e. this establishes Theorem B.…”
Section: The Nearby Lagrangian Conjecturesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…By the result in [33], the latter is indeed always the case. Furthermore, after a fiber-wise rescaling in T * T 2 (which induces a Hamiltonian isotopy of exact Lagrangian submanifolds), we may assume that any exact Lagrangian submanifold is contained in the bounded subset T * 1/4π S 1 × T * 1/4π S 1 .…”
Section: The Nearby Lagrangian Conjecturementioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Abouzaid and Kragh [2,61] have proved that L and L must be homotopy equivalent, and in a few cases-L = S 4n+1 or L = (S 1 × S 8n−1 ); see [1,33]-it is known that T * L remembers aspects of the smooth structure on L, i.e., T * L ∼ = ω T * (L#Σ) for certain homotopy spheres Σ. Question 2.3.…”
Section: 33mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue was highlighted by T. Kragh in [Kra07], and clarified in [Abo11], [Kra11] and [AS13]. Namely, if one defines the boundary operator of the Floer complex using standard conventions, the Floer complex of H is isomorphic to the Morse complex of S with a system of local coefficients on H 1 (T, M ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%