1991
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.181.3.1947083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT.

Abstract: While computed tomography (CT) has become an important imaging modality in the evaluation of the paranasal sinuses, the radiation dose remains higher than is necessary. With use of a head phantom and constant kilovolt peak setting, axial and coronal CT scans of the paranasal sinuses were obtained at each of six successively lower milliampere second settings than are commonly used in clinical practice. Although noise, as measured by the standard deviation of the CT numbers, did increase, images were of diagnost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a reduction of radiation dose will increase image noise, which may compromise image quality to a variable extent. 2,12,17,19,21,22 Previous studies on CT of the head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pediatric pelvis have suggested the possibility of reducing tube currents without jeopardizing imaging quality, 17,19,[23][24][25][26][27][28] but the tube current in those studies was adjusted manually. Such manual adjustment of tube current, based on patient weight or dimensions, can aid in establishing an appropriate balance between image noise and radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a reduction of radiation dose will increase image noise, which may compromise image quality to a variable extent. 2,12,17,19,21,22 Previous studies on CT of the head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pediatric pelvis have suggested the possibility of reducing tube currents without jeopardizing imaging quality, 17,19,[23][24][25][26][27][28] but the tube current in those studies was adjusted manually. Such manual adjustment of tube current, based on patient weight or dimensions, can aid in establishing an appropriate balance between image noise and radiation exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Greater attention has been directed toward adjusting CT parameters, most commonly through the reduction of milliampere-second (mAs) (tube current time product), to allow reduced radiation exposure while maintaining acceptable image quality. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Recently, high-pitch dual source multidetector CT systems have shown promise of even greater dose reduction. 14,15 Nevertheless, because of progressively decreasing signal-to-noise, a threshold for tube output is invariably reached, below which imaging becomes unacceptable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we used a dedicated low-dose protocol for sinusitis (sinusitis CT, 30 mAs) as amply described in the literature. [9][10][11] Second, we used a high-dose protocol for optimal soft-tissue delineation (140 mAs). Third, we had a dedicated protocol for CAS-CT (210 mAs).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%