2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182003003937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasite infracommunity diversity in eels: a reflection of local component community diversity

Abstract: The intestinal macroparasite communities of freshwater eels (Anguilla anguilla) captured in the south of England from Windsor (River Thames) during August 2001, and Leckford (River Test) during late June/July 2000, are reported for the first time. Parasite component communities were among the most species rich and diverse recorded from European eels. A total of 13 intestinal macroparasite species were encountered during the study, 8 from each eel host population with 3 being common to both. Acanthocephalans, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species abundance distributions are widely used in ecology but have only been applied to parasite communities on rare occasions (Norton et al 2003;Poulin 2007). Numerous theoretical models have been proposed to explain observed species abundance distributions; they make similar predictions, and there is no consensus as to which is the most realistic or useful (McGill et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species abundance distributions are widely used in ecology but have only been applied to parasite communities on rare occasions (Norton et al 2003;Poulin 2007). Numerous theoretical models have been proposed to explain observed species abundance distributions; they make similar predictions, and there is no consensus as to which is the most realistic or useful (McGill et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the presence of the parasite in eels in the Baltic (Markowski 1933) does not mean that the eel was infected there: more probably it was infected in freshwater and carried the parasite to sea with it. it would also explain why the parasite is generally absent from eels taken in the lower reaches of large rivers such as the rhine (thielen et al 2007), the thames (Norton et al 2003(Norton et al , 2004) and the tiber , and from slow flowing rivers in Belgium (Schabuss et al 1997) and the Netherlands (Borgsteede et al 1999). the absence of the parasite from some large lakes in central Europe, for example in Austria (schabuss et al 2005) and Hungary (Molnár and Székely 1995), may reflect the fact that the eels were not native to the lakes but were restocked into them as elvers which did not harbour the parasite: additionally many of these lakes are shallow and productive and would not provide the right habitat for the intermediate hosts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accidental species are not included. All British localities are listed in Kennedy and guégan (1996) with the addition of those listed in Kennedy et al (1998), Kennedy (2001 and Norton et al (2003Norton et al ( , 2004. All marine lagoons are listed in Køie (1988a), Kennedy et al (1997), Di cave et al (2001) and outeiral et al (2002.…”
Section: Dispersion Pattern In Infrapopulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When doing parasitological research in the field, species with infrequent occurrence and/or low intensity are routinely observed (Bush and Holmes, 1986;Norton et al 2003;Poulin, 2007a;Kennedy, 2012). While such rarely found species are noticed only when large outbreaks occur (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%