2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parasites as indicators of fish population structure at two different geographical scales in contrasting coastal environments of the south-western Atlantic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are indicative of environmental filtering in the parasite facets of diversity, which conforms with previous evidence only reported for TD of parasite communities of fish populations (e.g. Levy et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are indicative of environmental filtering in the parasite facets of diversity, which conforms with previous evidence only reported for TD of parasite communities of fish populations (e.g. Levy et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In these instances, assessment of parasite loads and assemblages has been used to define host populations that constitute management units or stocks (reviewed in Mackenzie [2002] and Lester & Moore [2015] among others). The use of parasites as biological tags in lieu of direct tagging of harvested species was first reported in the 1930s (Dogiel, 1939; Herrington, 1939), and it persists (Braicovich et al., 2017; Levy et al., 2019; Santos et al., 2009).…”
Section: Overexploitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atherinopsids are an important group of coastal fishes for artisanal and/or recreational fisheries, and have a great inter-population phenotypic plasticity, presenting morphological, morphometric and meristic differences along the marine coast [18][19][20][21] and in continental environments [22][23][24]. Due to its complexity, this group has been studied in different aspects of its biological cycle, but very few authors have established the identification of stocks of this group [14,18,25,26], and even less so in marine atherinids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show how the otoliths of this species change during growth, using morphology and geometric morphometry [36,37]. Levy et al [26], using the parasitic community of O. argentinenesis specimens caught in the Mar del Plata area (38 • 02 S, 57 • 31 W) and in the San Matías Gulf (40 • 50 S, 64 • 50 W), found that the evaluated individuals belonged to two different stocks. However, little is known about the stock spatial structure of these species in the rest of their distribution in the Argentinian Sea, where there are important fisheries for this resource; both in the coastal province of Buenos Aires and in northern Patagonia [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%