2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-008-0441-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parastomal hernia: is prevention better than cure? Use of preperitoneal polypropylene mesh at the time of stoma formation

Abstract: The results of the 2-year follow-up in this study (incidence of parastomal herniation 9.5%) along with available evidence in the literature (incidence 0-8.3%), compared to the results of repair make a strong case for the use of a mesh at the time of initial surgery for the formation of any permanent stoma to prevent parastomal herniation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have varied as to whether the prophylactic mesh was placed in an onlay, retromuscular, or intraperitoneal position. There does not appear to be any strong evidence to support any one method over another at this time (table 4) [94,96,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis also demonstrated cost savings and improvement in effectiveness for patients with Stage I to III rectal cancer undergoing APR with prophylactic mesh placement [106].…”
Section: Prevention With Prophylactic Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have varied as to whether the prophylactic mesh was placed in an onlay, retromuscular, or intraperitoneal position. There does not appear to be any strong evidence to support any one method over another at this time (table 4) [94,96,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. A recent cost-effectiveness analysis also demonstrated cost savings and improvement in effectiveness for patients with Stage I to III rectal cancer undergoing APR with prophylactic mesh placement [106].…”
Section: Prevention With Prophylactic Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no infectious complications, mesh removals, or erosions. 33 It was 10 years until the next prospective trials using prophylactic placement of mesh in an onlay, 34 sublay, 35 and intraperitoneal 36 position. In long-term follow-up, parastomal hernia rates were reported of 8.3%, 9.5%, and 0%, respectively.…”
Section: Prosthetic Parastomal Hernia Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polypropylennetze und leichte, großmaschige Netze ("low weight large pore") können auch in einem kontaminierten Situs ohne größere Komplikationen verwendet werden [6,23,24].…”
Section: > Alle Netztechniken Erfordern Eine Platzierung Mit Ausreichunclassified