2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.01.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parathyroid adenoma screening efficacies of different imaging tools and factors affecting the success rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprisingly high, given the reported sensitivity of localising methods such as high-resolution ultrasonography, technetium (Tc) 99m-methoxyisobutylisonitrile parathyroid scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging. These three techniques correctly identified 90, 72 and 67% of adenomas, respectively, in a study of PHPT patients, and combining the methods improved sensitivity even further (12). It is possible that these specialised techniques were not readily available; alternatively, as mentioned above, patient selection criteria might have been a factor, or the physician might have had additional reasons for choosing cinacalcet for these patients that were not reported in the eCRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprisingly high, given the reported sensitivity of localising methods such as high-resolution ultrasonography, technetium (Tc) 99m-methoxyisobutylisonitrile parathyroid scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging. These three techniques correctly identified 90, 72 and 67% of adenomas, respectively, in a study of PHPT patients, and combining the methods improved sensitivity even further (12). It is possible that these specialised techniques were not readily available; alternatively, as mentioned above, patient selection criteria might have been a factor, or the physician might have had additional reasons for choosing cinacalcet for these patients that were not reported in the eCRF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, USG and MIBI are two modalities most frequently used for preoperative localization of parathyroid adenomas providing high sensitivity and specificity [31,32,33,34,35]. USG alone is usually efficient enough to localize parathyroid adenoma preoperatively; MIBI is proposed to patients with nonlocalizing USG ( Figure 1) [36,37]. Besides, MIBI is more useful in localizing ectopic parathyroid adenomas, whereas USG -in intrathyroidal parathyroid adenomas [38].…”
Section: Preoperative Imaging Techniques-ultrasonography Computed Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8 ] In their study, Cakal et al . [ 9 ] had shown that cervical US had a sensitivity of 89.7% and the TC-99 m-MIBI of 71.8%, and their combined use had a sensitivity of 92.3%. On the other hand, EAG Ibrahim et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that the diagnosis of a parathyroid adenoma was missed by cervical US in 25% of patients with thyroid pathology. [ 9 ] Most diagnostic studies reported the PPV of the test instead of specificity due to false-negative cases. In their meta-analysis, comparing 12 studies, Moghadam et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%