2016
DOI: 10.1111/aas.12841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parecoxib, propacetamol, and their combination for analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized non‐inferiority trial

Abstract: Parecoxib and parecoxib+propacetamol provided significant opioid-sparing efficacy compared with placebo; non-inferiority of parecoxib to parecoxib+propacetamol was not demonstrated. Opioid-sparing efficacy was accompanied by significant reductions in pain intensity on movement, improved functional outcome, and less opioid-related symptom distress. Study medications were well tolerated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[9][10][11][12][13] Recently, a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, noninferiority, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and safety of combined PAR and PROP treatment, as well as treatment with each drug alone, for postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty. 14 Combined treatment, and both treatments alone, significantly reduced morphine consumption versus placebo. 14 This study also captured pulse oximetry data, and there were significantly fewer hypoxemic events for combined PAR and PROP treatment versus placebo.…”
Section: E251mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[9][10][11][12][13] Recently, a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, noninferiority, placebo-controlled study assessed the efficacy and safety of combined PAR and PROP treatment, as well as treatment with each drug alone, for postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty. 14 Combined treatment, and both treatments alone, significantly reduced morphine consumption versus placebo. 14 This study also captured pulse oximetry data, and there were significantly fewer hypoxemic events for combined PAR and PROP treatment versus placebo.…”
Section: E251mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A total of 2000 eligible participants will be randomized (3:1) using A stratifiedblock randomized method based on the disease and the center, select the appropriate length to one of the two treatment groups: experimental group (Tong-luo Qu-tong group) and control group (Qizheng Xiao-tong group). A number of previous clinical studies also had adopted unequal allocations ratio designs, it was possible to minimize the potentially unethical exposure of patients to placebo [30][31][32]. However, our study lacked a placebo group, which is different from previous studies.…”
Section: Randomization Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All included studies were randomized controlled trials. In summary, 17 studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] described random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Nine studies [12-14, 20, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28] described the blinding of participants and personnel.…”
Section: Evaluating Literature Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%