2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01669.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent age, lifespan and offspring survival: structured variation in life history in a wild population

Abstract: Summary 1.Understanding the degree to which reproductive success varies with an individual's age and lifespan, and the degree to which population-level variation mirrors individual-level variation, is central to understanding life-history evolution and the dynamics of age-structured populations. We quantified variation in the survival probability of offspring, one key component of reproductive success and fitness, in relation to parent age and lifespan in a wild population of red-billed choughs (Pyrrhocorax py… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
93
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
93
1
Order By: Relevance
“…predator susceptibility or competition for resources that reduces the survival probability of the offspring of young reproducers (e.g., Reid et al 2010). Hence, if age at first-time reproduction (i.e., 1-vs. 2-year old fish) has a genetic component in vendace, the r-selected, early maturation strategy is likely to become the dominant trait in the colonist population, just as observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…predator susceptibility or competition for resources that reduces the survival probability of the offspring of young reproducers (e.g., Reid et al 2010). Hence, if age at first-time reproduction (i.e., 1-vs. 2-year old fish) has a genetic component in vendace, the r-selected, early maturation strategy is likely to become the dominant trait in the colonist population, just as observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young breeders may be less successful at foraging because they are poorer at locating prey, physically less capable (Curio 1983) or because they are showing restraint because of their higher residual reproductive value (Williams 1966). A further challenge is to establish whether individuals improve their foraging performance with age, and if the higher average performance of older age classes is due to differential survival rates of individuals of differing foraging abilities (Smith 1981, Nol & Smith 1987, Reid et al 2010. Longitudinal studies are therefore essential to establish the relative importance of within-individual improvements and natural selection (Limmer & Becker 2009).…”
Section: Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was empirically demonstrated by manipulations of sibling competition or growth rate, which translated into increased oxidative damage [10], reduced antioxidant levels [11] or reduced erythrocyte resistance to oxidative stress [12], although some studies failed to detect such effects [13,14]. For these reasons, and because oxidative stress has been reported to predict life expectancy in some studies of birds [15,16], one might expect individual resistance to oxidative stress at an early age to explain variance in offspring fledging success and recruitment probability, both major correlates of offspring survival [17]. A link between pre-fledging oxidative damage and recruitment probability was reported in the long-lived European shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis and provides the first piece of evidence of a long-lasting effect of oxidative processes [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%