2016
DOI: 10.15344/2394-4978/2016/185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent & Child Perceptions of Child Health after Sibling Death

Abstract: Background Understanding children’s health after a sibling’s death and what factors may affect it is important for treatment and clinical care. This study compared children’s and their parents’ perceptions of children’s health and identified relationships of children’s age, gender, race/ethnicity, anxiety, and depression and sibling’s cause of death to these perceptions at 2 and 4 months after sibling death. Methods 64 children and 48 parents rated the child’s health “now” and “now vs before” the sibling’s d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies have had parents’ reports of children’s responses which can be different from reports by the children. In a recent study parents rated their children’s health better than children rated their own health in the first 4 months after the sibling’s death (Roche et al 2016). Most studies of sibling responses report on children whose siblings died of cancer (Gerhardt et al 2012; Nolbris and Hellström 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies have had parents’ reports of children’s responses which can be different from reports by the children. In a recent study parents rated their children’s health better than children rated their own health in the first 4 months after the sibling’s death (Roche et al 2016). Most studies of sibling responses report on children whose siblings died of cancer (Gerhardt et al 2012; Nolbris and Hellström 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, research in this area had small samples (Erlandsson et al 2010; Warland et al 2011), mainly White participants (Birenbaum 2000; Gerhardt et al 2012), a wide age range of children in the samples and methodological weaknesses. Most data were collected on parents’ perceptions of surviving children’s responses which often differ from children’s own responses (Lohan and Murphy 2001–2002; Roche et al 2016). Many studies have recruited samples from support groups or advertisements introducing sample bias with data collection up to 20 years after the sibling’s death (Lancaster 2011; Sood et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parents may find it difficult to provide well-siblings with emotional support as some parents lack insight into the functioning and mental health of well-siblings. 32 This may, in part, be due to some well-siblings choosing not to share their feelings with their parents, perhaps not wanting to further burden their parents or feeling that their parents lack emotional availability. 24,33 Emotional expression has been found to be significantly lower in a sample of children with a sibling with cancer, relative to a control group of children.…”
Section: Emotional Communication and Coping Support Related To Siblinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have largely white samples, 7,19,28 are parents’ reports of children’s responses, 20,21 and are from children whose siblings died of cancer. 15,16 Collecting data at 7 and 13 months post death allowed a view of changes in adolescents’ thoughts and behaviors not possible in cross sectional studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most data are collected on parents’ perceptions of surviving children’s responses 20,21 which can differ from children’s responses. 22 Many studies have recruited samples from support groups or advertisements introducing sample bias with data collection up to 20 years after the sibling’s death.…”
Section: Adolescents’ Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%