2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-011-9344-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent–child conversations about letters and pictures

Abstract: Learning about letters, and how they differ from pictures, is one important aspect of a young child’s print awareness. To test the hypothesis that parent speech provides children with information about these differences, we studied parent–child conversations in CHILDES (MacWhinney, 2000). We found that parents talk to their young children about letters, differentiating them from pictures, by 1–2 years of age and that some of these conversational patterns change across the preschool years in ways that emphasize… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For AK, it appears as if the effect of SES is mediated GAL alliteration, GRH Rhyming Socioeconomic differences in code-focused emergent… through fall preschool skills, as SES was no longer a significant predictor after initial status was included in the model. This strongly suggests that SES-related AK gaps are related to experiences outside of school contexts and aligns with literature suggesting that AK development can be facilitated by parents during the early years through conversation (Robins, Treiman, Rosales, & Otake, 2012;Treiman, Schmidt, Decker, Robins, Levine, & Demir, 2015) and shared storybook reading (Sénéchal, 2006). SES also predicted end-of-year PA skills, in line with evidence that the home literacy environment also plays a role in the PA development (Burgess, 2002).…”
Section: Ses-related Differences On Code-focused Skills In Preschoolsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…For AK, it appears as if the effect of SES is mediated GAL alliteration, GRH Rhyming Socioeconomic differences in code-focused emergent… through fall preschool skills, as SES was no longer a significant predictor after initial status was included in the model. This strongly suggests that SES-related AK gaps are related to experiences outside of school contexts and aligns with literature suggesting that AK development can be facilitated by parents during the early years through conversation (Robins, Treiman, Rosales, & Otake, 2012;Treiman, Schmidt, Decker, Robins, Levine, & Demir, 2015) and shared storybook reading (Sénéchal, 2006). SES also predicted end-of-year PA skills, in line with evidence that the home literacy environment also plays a role in the PA development (Burgess, 2002).…”
Section: Ses-related Differences On Code-focused Skills In Preschoolsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In surveys, parents and teachers of US preschoolers report that they tend to identify letters by their conventional names, such as /ɛm/ for 〈M〉, rather than by the sounds that they make in words, such as /m/ for 〈M〉 (Ellefson, Treiman, & Kessler, 2009; we use angled brackets to enclose letters, when it is important to be clear on their specific shapes, and slashes to enclose IPA symbols for phonemes). Consistent with the survey findings, analyses of conversations in preschoolers’ homes suggest that US parents do not often speak about letters as making sounds, although they do speak about letters by name (Robins, Treiman, Rosales, & Otake, in press). When US children enter kindergarten, as they normally do in the fall after they have passed their fifth birthday, they can often name a number of letters, performing better on uppercase ones than on lowercase ones (Ellefson et al, 2009; McBride-Chang, 1999; Worden & Boettcher, 1990).…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…The errors partly reflect the complexity of the long vowel’s spelling, a characteristic of the English writing system that holds across cultures. The stress that is put on letter names in the US, as documented in surveys of parents and teachers (Ellefson et al, 2009), analyses of letter-related conversations that occur in homes (Robins et al, in press), and studies of young children’s knowledge of letter names versus sounds (McBride-Chang, 1999, Treiman et al, 1998), also promotes errors like tam for tame in US children. That is, letter name knowledge is one contributor to the errors but not the only contributor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous study by Robins et al (2012) used these transcripts to compare talk about writing and about drawing; here our focus is on talk about letters. All 12 corpora included conversations recorded at home between U.S. parents and children, although two of them also included sessions that occurred in a laboratory setting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%