1997
DOI: 10.3109/13682829709017900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent—child interaction therapy and dysfluency: a single‐case study

Abstract: Abstracts The hypothesis that the modification of parent‐child interaction would reduce the dysfluency of a preschool child was tested in an experimental single‐case study. The subject, a four‐year‐old boy with a moderate to severe stutter, and his parents attended their local clinic for a total of 17 weeks. On each visit, 20‐minute play periods with each parent were recorded and measures of fluency taken. No advice was offered in the first six weeks and these measures were used as a baseline for subsequent th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measures included observations of parent–child interaction, parental reports of the referred child and siblings’ behaviour, the teacher's report of the child's behaviour, and parents’ self‐reports on their individual functioning, their relationship to one another and their satisfaction with the process and outcome of treatment. The potential efficacy of this approach was also supported by Matthews et al . (1997), who found through the use of a single‐case methodology significant therapeutic improvements following 17 sessions, and by Herschell et al .…”
Section: Recent Developments Of These Modelssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Measures included observations of parent–child interaction, parental reports of the referred child and siblings’ behaviour, the teacher's report of the child's behaviour, and parents’ self‐reports on their individual functioning, their relationship to one another and their satisfaction with the process and outcome of treatment. The potential efficacy of this approach was also supported by Matthews et al . (1997), who found through the use of a single‐case methodology significant therapeutic improvements following 17 sessions, and by Herschell et al .…”
Section: Recent Developments Of These Modelssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These authors used a repeated‐measures, single‐subject design, which is a methodology that has been used to investigate the efficacy of therapy for children who stutter (Matthews et al . , Millard et al . ) and has advantages when research is conducted in real‐world clinical settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCIT is widely used in speech and language therapy in the UK. Results of its use in dysfluency (Mathews et al, 1997; Millard et al, 2008, 2009) and recently with older children with language disorders (Allen and Marshall, 2011) have been published. It is commonly used with young children with delayed language but evidence for its effectiveness is lacking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of PCIT with children who stammer has been examined in single case and case series studies (see Mathews et al, 1997; Millard et al, 2008, 2009) and a recent paper (Allen and Marshall, 2011) has reported its use with 8–10-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI). The former studies conducted within the Michael Palin Centre, London investigated the style of PCIT developed there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%