2021
DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2021.1976399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent-child relationship and child anger proneness in infancy and attachment security at toddler age: a short-term longitudinal study of mother- and father-child dyads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lipscomb et al (2011) found that adversarial dynamics between children's negative emotionality and mothers' and fathers' overreactive parenting between infancy and toddler age were largely similar for mother-and father-child dyads. Bendel-Stenzel et al (2022) found an interaction effect of infants' anger and mother-child security at 15 months for children's outcome (self-regulation) at 5 ½ years, consistent with the differential susceptibility model, for mother-child dyads but not for father-child dyads. In their recent review, Taraban and Shaw (2018) concluded that evidence for the association between child difficulty and harsh parenting was clearer for mothers and children than for fathers and children.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Lipscomb et al (2011) found that adversarial dynamics between children's negative emotionality and mothers' and fathers' overreactive parenting between infancy and toddler age were largely similar for mother-and father-child dyads. Bendel-Stenzel et al (2022) found an interaction effect of infants' anger and mother-child security at 15 months for children's outcome (self-regulation) at 5 ½ years, consistent with the differential susceptibility model, for mother-child dyads but not for father-child dyads. In their recent review, Taraban and Shaw (2018) concluded that evidence for the association between child difficulty and harsh parenting was clearer for mothers and children than for fathers and children.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…It was found that the group of leftover children had a significantly lower sense of safety than those who were not left behind, and the longer they were left behind, the stronger the children's sense of unsafety [32]. Parent-offspring separation led to poor interpersonal safety among left-behind children, who were more prone to exhibiting emotional instabilities.…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Safety Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 97%