2014
DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2014.01026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parent-delivered touchscreen intervention for children with fragile X syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apps have proven popular ( Clark et al, 2014 ) and case-series designs have revealed promising uses of these technologies (e.g. Díez-Juan et al, 2014 ). Our study does not refute these findings but does indicate that the impact of an app on behaviour may have its limits, and caution should be applied when recommending technology-based supports for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apps have proven popular ( Clark et al, 2014 ) and case-series designs have revealed promising uses of these technologies (e.g. Díez-Juan et al, 2014 ). Our study does not refute these findings but does indicate that the impact of an app on behaviour may have its limits, and caution should be applied when recommending technology-based supports for this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of touchscreen tablets (such as the iPad ™ ) means that we can now explore the delivery of therapeutic and educational content to very young children using technology ( Díez-Juan et al, 2014 ; Kagohara et al, 2013 ; Murdock et al, 2013 ). This approach brings together the belief in early intervention as the best opportunity for children with ASD ( Wallace and Rogers, 2010 ) with the specific advantages of technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, touchscreen tasks for mouse models of neurodevelopmental disorders with intellectual disabilities offer advantages in designing tasks that allow the researcher to titrate the demands on working memory and evaluate various cognitive domains, using equipment similar to that used in human subjects with intellectual disabilities ( Green et al, 2009 ; Van der Molen et al, 2010 ; van Nieuwpoort et al, 2011 ; Berry-Kravis et al, 2013 ; Díez-Juan et al, 2014 ). Our findings with a new touchscreen DNMTP task revealed that Fmr1 mutant mice on the FVB/AntJ background performed as well as their WT controls on a delay-dependent working memory task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, touchscreen behavioral testing equipment ideal for evaluating complex learning and memory in rodents was introduced by Bussey et al (2001) at the University of Cambridge and rigorously validated in mice by Brigman and Rothblat (2008) and others ( Bussey et al, 2012 ; Mar et al, 2013 ; Oomen et al, 2013 ; Graybeal et al, 2014 ). Visually based, touch-sensitive technology in operant chambers is similar to cognitive testing designs in higher-order species, including nonhuman primates and humans ( Green et al, 2009 ; Van der Molen et al, 2010 ; van Nieuwpoort et al, 2011 ; Berry-Kravis et al, 2013 ; Díez-Juan et al, 2014 ). Investigations using mouse touchscreen chambers have recently been published by several behavioral neuroscience laboratories ( Brigman et al, 2005 ; Talpos et al, 2010 ; Graybeal et al, 2011, 2014 ; Romberg et al, 2011 ; Bussey et al, 2012 ; Silverman et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In scenarios where the child(ren) experienced tantrums, were less emotionally regulated, or had difficulties staying in the same position for some duration of time, the caregiver's ability to participate was negatively affected. 52 , 67 71 Furthermore, the child's comfort with technology and with their home environment was reported to reduce anxieties associated with participating in appointments. 72 , 73 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%